Georgia Law does not Tolerate Drunk (DUI) Drivers Causing Accidents (and Your Injury Case may Have Significantly more Value if the At-Fault Driver was DUI)
As an Atlanta DUI accident lawyer, I know first hand that Georgia law does not tolerate drunk (DUI) Drivers. My many years of experience representing clients in Georgia DUI accidents cases has taught me that unlike dog bite cases, there is no "first bite" rule when it comes to drunk driving and auto accidents. DUI drivers are subject to serious criminal penalties and punitive civil damages even for their first drug or alcohol induced accident. However, the number of prior drug or alcohol offenses can be a significant factor in determining both the value of the injured party's claim and the number of other potentially responsible defendants.
Obviously, a driver with multiple drunken driving offenses will be subject to a higher punitive damage award than a person with no such prior offenses. Circumstances are important as well. A very drunk driver who causes a collision while on the way from one bar to another will be a far more inviting punitive damage target than an older woman who had one too many cocktails at a Sunday school party. It is imperative to learn the story behind the drinking in order to determine its real value to the case.
If the impaired driver is acting within the course and scope of his/her employment at the time of the accident, the employer will be responsible for the injured party's actual damages to the same extent as its employee. However, any punitive damages awarded against the drunk driver will not be the responsibility of the driver's employer because punitive damages are awarded to deter or punish specific behavior. This distinction can be hugely significant because insurance coverage may not exist (or may be inadequate) for punitive damages awarded only against the drunk driver.