Atlanta Personal Injury Lawyers Blog

I have recently been retained by two clients to pursue premises liability claims for injuries resulting from two separate criminal assaults in south Atlanta. As an Atlanta personal injury lawyer, I regularly get calls from victims of crimes or their family members where an individual is criminally attacked and assaulted. The assaults may include beatings, muggings, car jackings, shootings, stabbings, robbery and rape and often times result in catastrophic psychological and physical injuries and death.

Inadequate security at hotels and motels, apartment complexes, gas stations, convenient stores, shopping malls, parking lots, movie theaters, bank ATM's, as well as other retail businesses, is the reason many of these attacks occur. An owner or operator of a business must exercise ordinary care in keeping their premises safe. This duty includes protecting patrons and business guests from injury and death caused by foreseeable criminal acts of third parties.

Whether damages can be recovered against the land or business owner or operator depends on whether the crime was "foreseeable" and the security was inadequate. There is a huge body of case law on what makes a crime foreseeable. In making this determination, the courts look at previous similar criminal activity in the area. Generally, the prior criminal activity must be substantially similar, but does not have to be identical.

Substantially similar means the prior crimes should have put an ordinary prudent person on notice that the patron or guest was facing an increased risk of attack. It is a comparison of the nature of the crimes that determine similarity - was it a crime against a person or against property alone - and not a comparison of the details of the crime or even the degree of force used. Making an appropriated showing of substantial similarity and the foreseeabilty of the crime is critical to the success to recovering damages in these types of cases.

If you can convince the court and jury that the crime is foreseeable, you then next need to show that the security measures were inadequate and that adequate security would have prevented the attack. This can also be difficult, but is often much easier to prove than whether the crime was foreseeable because many businesses are concerned about costs, and things like putting up fences, installing and monitoring security cameras, providing adequate lighting and hiring security guards all cost money, but don't make money. Also, juries can understand that these types of security measures do prevent crime.

The two new cases I have are going to take a lot of time and energy and legal skill to properly handle. These are not simple fender bender claims and cannot be handled by just any lawyer. If you or a family member has been a victim to a crime and think you may have a claim against the owner or operator of the land or business where the attack occurred, please make sure the lawyer you talk to can handle this type of case.

This morning I was saddened to read in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution on line about a bicyclist killed in a collision in Woodstock, Georgia. As a personal injury lawyer who represents clients throughout north Georgia and as an avid cyclist, I am well aware of the risks of cycling on the roads in metro Atlanta and the surrounding communities. The article had very little information about what happened, but did say that the driver of a Van pulled out from a bank parking lot and the cyclist was killed when he rode his bike into the side of the Van. What a tragedy.

It is impossible for me to say at this time who was at fault for causing the collision, but my guess is that the driver of the Van failed to yield to the bike pulling into the road thinking the road was clear when it wasn't. As a cyclist, I have had many close calls when cars, vans, trucks, etc., have done the same thing to me. As a personal injury lawyer, I have represented other cyclists who have been badly injured when this has happened to them. This time, someone was killed.

Road biking is a wonderful sport and is especially enjoyable this time of year when the leaves are turning and the weather is perfect. Unfortunately, it is a very dangerous activity with the amount of traffic on our Georgia roads. I am hopeful that motorist will be reminded by this tragic accident to be more diligent to look out for both bicyclist and motorcyclist as they travel out roads.

My thoughts and prayers are with the family of the deceased.

As a personal injury lawyer in Atlanta and north Georgia, I am always interested in articles written in magazines and newspapers that are related to my practice. Today, I read two such articles in the New York Times on line. Both articles dealt with texting and driving and the catastrophic consequences of doing so.

The first article was entitled "Driven to Distraction: When Texting Kills, Britain Offers Path to Prison." This article discussed at length the tragic death of a 24 for year old university trained fashion designer caused by a 22 year old woman that plowed her car into the rear of the deceased's vehicle while texting. She had exchanged nearly two dozen texts with five different friends the hour before the fatal collision, and a last incoming message that was never opened came in seconds before the accident.

A jury convicted the 22 year old and a judge sentenced her to 21 months in a high security prison. The article discussed the case at length but also discussed British attitudes toward texting and driving and the criminal laws against the practice. The case has driven home to Britains the serious consequences of texting and driving, and a prison sentence from 4 to 7 years is now recommended if I person is killed when a driver is texting and causes an accident.

In a related article, "Many in the U.S. Want Texting at the Wheel to be Illegal," the author discusses the findings of a recent New York Times/CBS News poll finding that nearly all Americans say texting while driving should be punished as harshly as drunken driving. The article discusses other poll findings including that 80 percent of those polled felt using a hand-held cell phone while driving should be also illegal.

Several Blogs ago I wrote about the perils of texting and driving. As the articles discussed above indicate, the consequences of texting and driving can be catastrophic injuries including death, and we can expect more States to make doing so illegal. If you have been injured in an accident by a distracted motorist texting while driving, please call me to discuss your claims and damages and the possibility of pursuing punitive damages to help deter this behavior.